| PDF: |
 |
Author(s): |
Sineva N. A., |
| Number of journal: |
3(76) |
Date: |
September 2026 |
| Annotation: |
The article explores the theoretical and practical
aspects of harmonizing the legal regulation of trade relations
within the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). The author
argues that creating a unified legal framework in the Union
requires standardizing the terminology used in the legislation
of member states when regulating foreign economic and trade
activities.
The paper carries out a comparative legal analysis
of the national legislative acts of the Russian Federation,
the Republic of Armenia, the Republic of Belarus, the Republic
of Kazakhstan, and the Kyrgyz Republic. As a result of this
analysis, the author concludes that the terms ‘foreign economic
activity’ and ‘foreign trade activity’ in the legal acts
of the Union member states are addressed to varying degrees.
At the same time, it has recently become relevant to officially
record the term ‘foreign trade activity’ at the legislative level.
Within the framework of this study, the distinction between
the concepts of “mutual trade” and “countertrade” is of significant
importance. The author concludes that the first
of these terms is primarily enshrined in the norms of customs
legislation and is used for statistical purposes, whereas
the second is revealed through contractual structures.
In the system of international private law, the fundamental
source regulating relations in the field of countertrade is the 1992 UNCITRAL Legal Guide on International Countertrade
Transactions. Based on the analysis, the author sums up
that within the EAEU, they are mutual trade mechanisms that
are mostly used today, while countertrade, which is a complex
institution of international private law, remains normatively
unregulated at the supranational level. This situation
highlights the need for a deeper doctrinal understanding
of the legal frameworks for mutual trade and countertrade
as a prerequisite for developing effective regulatory mechanisms
in the context of Eurasian integration. |
| Keywords: |
Eurasian Economic Union / EAEU, foreign trade
activity, foreign economic activity, harmonization, unification,
entrepreneurial activity, mutual trade, countertrade, domestic
law of the EAEU member states, private international law |
| For citation: |
Sineva N. A. Harmonization of legal regulation in the trade sphere within the EAEU. Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo =
Business. Education. Law. 2026;3(76):184—191. DOI: 10.25683/VOLBI.2026.76.1751. |