| PDF: |
 |
Author(s): |
Demchenko V. A., |
| Number of journal: |
3(76) |
Date: |
September 2026 |
| Annotation: |
A prosecutor’s demand is binding only to the extent
that it rests on powers granted by law. Yet the Law on
the Prosecutor’s Office, naming the types of response measures,
says nothing about the content of an authoritative demand
or about the possibility of performing it. The substantive parameters
of a submission, a protest and a warning are therefore
shaped case by case in judicial practice.
The author argues whether legal certainty and real enforceability
are criteria of the quality of supervisory work or rather
conditions of the lawfulness of a legally significant act
of the prosecutor. The answer is justified in favor of the second
option, after which the limits of their legislative consolidation
are outlined. Certainty is disclosed through five elements: indication
of a specific violation, applicable legal norms, factual circumstances, required legal result and proper addressee.
Enforceability comprises the factual possibility of performance,
the competence of the addressee, a reasonable time limit
and the prohibition to predetermine an issue left by law
to the discretion of the addressee, in particular an employee’s
disciplinary liability.
A breach of these requirements gives an independent ground
to declare the act unlawful even where a violation of law
by the addressee has been confirmed. Address uncertainty
and addressing an incompetent person are distinguished separately.
Amendments are proposed to Article 24 of the Federal
Law dated January 17, 1992, No. 2202‑1, establishing the minimum
“standard” for a prosecutor’s lawful demand. |
| Keywords: |
prosecutorial response act, legal certainty, real
enforceability, prosecutor’s submission, prosecutor’s protest,
prosecutor’s warning, prosecutorial supervision, legally significant
act, judicial challenge, prosecutorial discretion, lawfulness
of the demand |
| For citation: |
Demchenko V. A. Legal certainty and real enforceability as criteria for assessing the legality of prosecutorial response
acts. Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo = Business. Education. Law. 2026;3(76):198—203. DOI: 10.25683/VOLBI.2026.76.1730. |