PDF: |
|
Author(s): |
Korobeinikova T. S., |
Number of journal: |
4(49) |
Date: |
November 2019 |
Annotation: |
The artice justifies necessity of legal fixation of the probation institution based on the hypothesis about interaction of the post‑penal effect and behavior of persons released from the places of imprisonment. Social security amd administrative oversight is the important state measures relative to the persons released from the places of imprisonment. The first type of activity is required for assisting to come back to the life conditions usual for normal person. As such issues are difficult to be set independently the imprisoned persons need help from the state. However, the measured taken by the state are not always successful for complete socvial adaptation of such persons. Administrative oversight, in its turn, is required for preventing new crimes by setting limitations and restrictions for the supervised persons, for prevention and upbringing. However, in certain cases this prevents complete socialization of the imprisoned person. In this regard, additional measures are required ensuring observation of the rights of the persons endured punishment and providing possibility of the life conditions required for the normal life of the persons released from imprisonment. Succession in operation of the Federal Service for Execution of Punishment and the authorities concerned shall be provided. According to the authors, the complex resolution of the issues aimed at re‑socialization of the persons released from imprisonment is possible by introducing the probation institution that successfully operates in foreign states. Critical processing of foreign experience of the post‑penal supervision, revision of the valids regulations, determination of the state authorities and non‑commercial agencies that can be involved in social adaptation of such persons can lead to the required positive result. |
Keywords: |
persons released from places of imprisonment,
administrative oversight, social support, supervised person,
probation service, re‑socialization, principles of administrative
oversight, social adaptation, administrativer restriction, entities
performing administrative oversight, risk factors of illegal
behavior, prevention of recidivism. |
For citation: |
Korobeinikova T. S. Social support and administrative oversight as a means of re-socialization of persons released
from places of imprisonment. Business. Education. Law, 2019, no. 4, pp. 336–340. DOI: 10.25683/VOLBI.2019.49.433. |