CLASSIFICATION OF DIGITAL RIGHTS IMPLEMENTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH INFORMATION SYSTEM RULES
Back to articles of current journal| PDF: |  |
Author(s): | Safiullin R. R., |
| Number of journal: | 4(73) | Date: | December 2025 |
| Annotation: | This article examines the issue of classifying digital rights implemented in accordance with the rules of an information system as objects of civil regulation in the Russian Federation. An in-depth analysis is conducted of the essence and legal nature of digital rights in light of the provisions of Article 141.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, according to which they are interpreted as obligatory and other rights, the content parameters and implementation procedure of which are determined by the norms of the relevant information system. Particular attention is paid to the methodological framework of the study, which involves a comprehensive examination of normative legal documents, theoretical developments, and materials from judicial practice. International regulatory experience is reviewed: in the European Union, the MiCA Regulation creates a unified system for crypto-assets with a primary focus on protecting investors; in the USA, a fragmented approach is applied—SEC classifies tokens as securities, and certain states recognize DAO as legal entities; in China, strict state control is in place with a complete ban on private cryptocurrency transactions. These approaches illustrate the need to strike a balance between fostering technological innovations and state oversight, which can serve as a guideline for improving the Russian legal framework, including by enhancing the role of information system operators and optimizing transaction verification procedures. The research results confirm that the proposed classification contributes to systematizing the types of digital rights and identifying the specifics of their circulation in the digital environment. The obtained conclusions are consistent with doctrinal views on digital rights as a form of traditional rights but emphasize the need to eliminate gaps in the Russian regulation compared to foreign approaches. The recommendations are aimed at improving standards to increase the efficiency of electronic transactions and protect the interests of participants. | ||
| Keywords: | digital rights, civil regulation, information systems, digital financial assets, intellectual rights, digital identity, judicial practice, smart contracts, comparative legal studies, legal gaps |
||
| For citation: | Safiullin R. R. Classification of digital rights implemented in accordance with information system rules. Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo = Business. Education. Law. 2025;4(73):279—284. DOI: 10.25683/VOLBI.2025.73.1487. |
||