| PDF: |
 |
Author(s): |
Kubievich S. V., Lapshin I. S., Rodimushkina O. V., Shushaniya S. S., |
| Number of journal: |
1(74) |
Date: |
March 2026 |
| Annotation: |
The article examines current problems
in the implementation of the constitutional freedom of assembly
in the Russian Federation. The subject of the analysis is
the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian
Federation formulated over the past 20 years and their impact
on the development of legislation and law enforcement practice.
The relevance of the topic is determined by the contradictions
between the notification procedure for holding public events,
established by federal legislation, and the actual formation
of a conciliatory-permissive practice by authorities.
The aim of the study is to identify the main trends
in the evolution of the legal positions of the Constitutional
Court of the Russian Federation, systematize the constitutional
and legal criteria for restricting the freedom of assembly,
and determine the degree of influence of these positions
on law enforcement practice and legislation. The methodological
framework includes dialectical, historical-legal, systemic,
formal-legal, and comparative-legal methods.
The authors systematize the key approaches of the Constitutional
Court of the Russian Federation concerning the limits
of permissible restriction on the freedom of assembly, the content
of the positive obligations of the state, as well as the conditions
for holding organizers accountable. Two main stages
in the evolution of legal positions are identified: the first stage
(2007–2012) was characterized by the predominant recognition
of the admissibility of restrictions, while the second
stage (from 2012 to the present) is marked by the formation
of a comprehensive system of principles for implementing
the freedom of assembly and an emphasis on the positive obligations
of the state.
The work defines the constitutional and legal criteria
for restrictions (federal law, constitutionally significant goals,
the principles of necessity, proportionality, and commensurability,
the presumption of a peaceful nature), and also identifies problems
of law enforcement: the transformation of the notification
procedure into a permissive one, the lack of a uniform approach
to qualifying a series of single pickets, and a formal approach
to establishing guilt and causation. Recommendations for improving
legislation and law enforcement practice are formulated. |
| Keywords: |
Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation,
legal position, freedom of assembly, freedom of demonstrations,
demonstration, public event, restriction of freedom of assembly,
positive obligations of the state, notification procedure, single
picket |
| For citation: |
Lapshin I. S., Shushaniya S. S., Rodimushkina O. V., Kubievich S. V. Evolution of legal positions of the Constitutional
Court of the Russian Federation concerning the implementation of the citizens’ right to public events. Biznes. Obrazovanie.
Pravo = Business. Education. Law. 2026;1(74):223—228. DOI: 10.25683/VOLBI.2026.74.1577. |